what do functionally stupid parties generate? Functionally stupid policies.

Harry


On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> I have found a review
>
> http://eight2late.wordpress.com/2013/05/07/a-stupidity-based-theory-of-organisations-a-paper-review/
> an article
>
> http://www.hcamag.com/the-lighter-side/a-stupiditybased-theory-of-organisations-177391.aspx
>
> and slides from the author
>
> http://www.lth.se/fileadmin/indek2013/program/Alvesson_functional_stupidity_scaIEM.pdf
>
> my corporate culture is absolutely synchronous with what is said, like on
> Groupthink.
>
> About Kuhn paradigm change resistance, it is not applicable to our domain,
> except maybe for finance and economics, but I won't name that science. ;-)
>
> it looks pure bashing, but it is important to understand that when the
> opinion of your peers is more important than the reality, then stupidity
> rules, and is productive.
>
> that is also the condition for groupthink...
>
> I think that with planetary groupthink, multinational network of
> stupid-ruled corporations, understanding groupthink  dynamics, functional
> stupidity is important...
>
> In France we have a reference book called "les decisions absurdes" (no
> need to translate)...
>
> No relation with latest Swedish radio broadcast, as if there was a
> campaign to prevent people to believe in anticipated evidences (Coyaud,
> Gary wright, Giancarlo, and few blogs are waking up). Hopefully some Greeks
> and Armenian gave hope to them (pfff...) .
>
>
> 2014-05-27 14:54 GMT+02:00 Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com>:
>
>> After Finance and some other scientific subject, Cold fusion finished to
>> persuade me of the importance of Groupthink and similar Cognitive
>> Dysfunction in organization and groups
>> (like Benabou work
>> http://www.princeton.edu/~rbenabou/papers/Groupthink%20IOM%202012_07_02%20BW.pdf).
>>
>>
>> This paper's abstract seems to cover that subject
>>
>> http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/enhanced/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01072.x/
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to