Guys, I will add my weird two cents, based upon my version of a "Theory of Everything", which allows me to help predict the future:
1) Don Hotson worked on Guam for 10 years 2) Guam has approx. 20-30,000,000 watts of pulsed microwave military radars and 50-10 times incidence of ALS/motor neuron disease in locals, linked with blue-green algae, which I am finding around microwave radar towers (algae blooms) in Florida and other places: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19929726 3) Pulsed microwave radars are shown to increase the rates of Leukemia http://www.safeschool.ca/uploads/Yakymenko_cancer_MW2011.pdf 4) Don died of Leukemia I think I figured out what all of this reflected pulsed microwave/RF radiation really is doing to the CaCO3 in reefs, starfish and sea urchins: They are pulsed electromagnetic water softeners, dissolving CaCO3. http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/06/17/the-clue-is-in-the-goo/ In my model, the Doppler electromagnetic pulses are scattered and ducted back to Earth due to quantum vacuum in our atmosphere (we call its effects the "weather"), which should bend electromagnetic radiation, including light waves, microwaves and RF, due to "domain walls", strings, etc. from our quantum vacuum decaying gravity field from the Sun. In other words, it is the failure of physics to accept the Dirac Sea/Quantum Vacuum and its properties that is gradually damaging/killing us all around these microwave radars. Stewart On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:21 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: > And this interesting tidbit from a recent PhysOrg article: > > “Rozhkov also noted that at low temperatures and in high magnetic fields, > fermions begin to behave as if they had no spin.” > > “Physicists predict new state of matter” > http://phys.org/news/2014-06-physicists-state.html > > And I’m going to add my spin to the topic… > ‘Spin’ and other behaviors or properties of fundamental particles are only > our perception of what is going on, and the terms used have probably > delayed > discovery of what is really going on. Attosecond physics and other > experimental techniques have begun to reveal a more accurate picture of > what > subatomic particles really are. > > -mark > > _____________________________________________ > From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 6:44 AM > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: RE: [Vo]:Don Hotson has passed away > > > From: Steve High > > Here is a sure indication of his value, to physicists with > open minds: decades of asking obvious but inconvenient questions (where > does > spin energy come from? [snip] > > A detail that stands out in Zebuhr’s writeup, relative to Rossi (and to > other forms of anomalous energy with a ferromagnetic component) in trying > to > explain how large amounts of thermal energy can appear without a known > nuclear source - is this paragraph. > > “It solves the problem that got Don in trouble in physics class—the > apparent > violation of conservation of energy that occurs during “pair production” > when a photon of at least 1.022 MeV “creates” an electron-positron pair and > does not account for the large spin energy in the “created” particles. Don > shows that the spin comes directly from the negative-energy “sea,” > restoring > conservation.” > > OK. Not sure that is worded as well as it could be - but think about the > inverse of that reaction in the context of the “quantum foam” – the > interface of 3-space with reciprocal space, where the epo field can be > sensed on both sides of the dimensional interface. > > The electrons and positrons from the “sea” are attracted across the > interface by a magnetic “gateway,” which can be the nucleus of a > ferromagnetic atom like Ni-62, but when they cannot tunnel across, will > instead occasionally annihilate into photons, which can remain in either > dimension. Either 2 or 3 photons are formed which creates problems for > conservation of spin which is generally ignored. > > However, if spin energy remains in the gateway nucleus (a nickel atom) it > can be thermalized as excess heat. It is also possible for spin to couple > the other way, and for energy to be removed from 3-space. > > This energy in one sense is nuclear, but in another sense arises from > matter > and antimatter. That is why it was labeled as not a “known nuclear source” > since it is not appreciated as the source of thermal gain (or loss) in > LENR. > > One of the reasons that Don was attracted to Brian Ahern’s work for EPRI > was > that he realized that anomalous cooling could also be an effect of the > Dirac > sea – which Brian showed. > > Too bad Don could not hang on long enough to see an unequivocal report > which > we are all hoping will happen with the TIP/Elforsk report. > > That report, if positive, will almost certainly point to Hotson’s Dirac > explanation - and NOT to Focardi’s (nickel transmuting into copper). > > Jones > >
