Hey, June 21st is my birfday, I will be 50, which kinda sucks because I still act 18. I will make the claim in advance that the Earth is not really round, it is a 6-D vacuum torus with a glob of baryonic decay around it that we play in.
Stewart On Wednesday, June 18, 2014, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > From: Bob Cook > > I am not so sure that Rossi is completely wrong…. If the > first step is to create heavy electrons that facilitate the reaction of a > proton with a Ni nucleus, Rossi may be correct. > > Bob, > > Normally we expect that the inventor understands his device, but you are > aware of the problems with that view - has anything changed? > > There is no known nuclear reaction of nickel which produces only stable > isotopes as ash, and no reaction with a proton to go to copper which > matches > the facts- which are no gammas and no radioactive isotopes, and with no > disproportion of isotopes compared to natural ratios. > > The Swedes already did isotope analysis of the copper in the ash (which is > definitely there at about 10%) and found the isotope ratio was completely > natural, with no radioactivity and no indication of transmutation. They > concluded that the copper (and iron) was there initially. They found no > light elements. > > Of course, one can invent another miracle, besides the first miracle of > nuclear fusion, and assert that not only does proton-addition happen, but > it > is a new kind of fusion reaction, previously unknown to physics which > creates only stable isotopes; but then the third miracle is the isotope > ratio, which must remain completely natural. That is three miracles > required. > > Many of Rossi’s supporters will not rule out nickel to copper, despite > “conservation of miracles”, since the inventor believes it to be true and > he > should be given benefit of doubt. FWIW - my view is that Rossi does not > understand his own invention, nor do the top experts like Ed Storms. It > simply cannot involve transmutation of nickel to copper or the fusion of > protons to deuterium (which will eventually produce tritium, which is > absent). The Swedes ran it for 6 months, and they will have lots of tritium > to show us - if this is what Ed Storms believes it to be. > > But after 6 months if there is no substantial tritium then there is no > hydrogen fusion at all, and we must look for other explanations. > > I am still optimistic for a Saturday release of the report. It is the > midsummer holiday in Sweden and June 21 was the date in 1633 when Galileo > was forced by the Inquisition to abjure his Copernican views… a fitting day > for any pariah to confront the mainstream stance. > > >
