Jones,
        I have always railed against this 2nm limitation as you approach the 
walls of a cavity - I think this is why Horrace objected to my theory - being 
too weak by magnitudes at these distances  to account for the anomalous 
energies claimed however my  relativistic interpretation of Casimir effect is  
based on Naudt's paper describing hydrinos as relativistic hydrogen.. It 
sidesteps this issue because the limitation doesn't exist locally for the 
hydrogen as the available space continues to enlarge by placing the hydrogen in 
a different inertial frame - it contracts from our perspective.  IOW the stress 
of pillaring casimir mirrors apart so that they can't move warps space time 
between them and these 2nm measurments you mentioned are a limitation only from 
our perspective outside the cavity. In the diminishing 3d volume we perceive 
from outside the cavity the moving hydrogen must be approaching within 2nm of 
the walls but locally inside the narrowing cavity these hydrogen perceive the 
walls shrinking away as they are bathed in and surrounded by full size virtual 
particles that shouldn't be able to fit there either... IMHO this lattice 
mechanism  is why so much gas can load into a lattice - the conductive lattice 
of the metal is reforming the interstitial space relativistically .. by forcing 
the stream of  virtual particles to slip through our 3d plane at a different 
angle similar to what happens to a spaceship approaching C but without the need 
for spatial displacement.

This does allow energy in from another dimension because you are exposing 
freely moving gas to changes in inertia based on these changes in Casimir force 
but the difficulty is in making the path asymmetrical or the gas atoms will 
simply convert between different fractional values without any local awareness. 
 The Lyne atomic oven or MAHG were based on a atomic vs molecular reaction to 
changes in the geometry [DCE] but many of the other theories suggested here on 
vortex would also model an asymmetrical path to exploit the differences between 
inertial frames being visited. I also think this is why we have claims of time 
dilation / radioactive decay anomalies in this field - the metal lattice 
segregates vacuum wavelengths such that you have concentrated regions of high 
suppression being fed by other perhaps more distributed regions of low 
suppression and whatever regions the gas atoms favor due to their geometry and 
flow determines the degree and direction of dilation.
Fran

_____________________________________________
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:38 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:C60D60 - Fullerene Deuteride as a fusion fuel?


Fran,

An interesting point about the FD - is in the context of the Casimir force. For 
a moment let's consider an "empty" Fullerene. A lot is known about them
http://web.mit.edu/anish/www/Carbon-JBH-2004.pdf

Of course, the sphere itself, if large enough, could be a Casimir cavity which 
would then perhaps have a zone of energy alteration inside the sphere. The 
carbon walls, however, are too strong to compress, so there is no internal 
"force" per se. Would a zone of energy depletion then tend to draw in mass from 
another dimension?

That is this premise. No fusion, simply a gateway for something like "quantum 
foam" (Wheeler conception). My understanding is that the maximum value of the 
Casimir force is found at 2nm wall separation. Is that your understanding? This 
corresponds to a diameter of which is larger than the interior space of the C60 
sphere. See the images above - and the conclusion that the diameter of the C60 
is about 7 angstrom. This is actually smaller than the Bohr diameter (twice the 
Bohr radius). Since even hydrogen is not encouraged to enter - there should be 
an ultra vacuum inside C60.

Anyway - the point is that if the FD is also a Casimir cavity, albeit too small 
and too strong to allow the contents to be pressurized by the Casimir force, 
and not the most robust cavity size for gain; yet - this cavity could still 
serve as a "wormhole" to the Dirac Sea since its interior is "beyond a vacuum" 
in also excluding radiation and atoms.

      ___________________________________________

      Imagine... a Fullerene... which is of course 60 atoms of carbon arranged 
in the famous tightly bound sphere, and known to be superconductor in certain 
conditions -- but now we fully hydrogenate these carbon atoms with deuterium to 
produce C60D60.

      I can think of no reason that this cannot be done. A brief google turns 
up nothing for this exact species, but did turn up an indication that the 
hydrogen version, C60H60 has been made in the Lab... If C60 will hydrogenate at 
all, then it should be possible to use only deuterium to arrive at C60D60.

      The reason: well, consider that FD or Fullerene Deuteride - C60D60 - 
would have interesting nuclear properties - as a massive stable boson in a 
dense unit. Eat your heart out, Higgs :)

      Carbon is all three boson types: a nuclear boson, an atomic boson and a 
molecular boson. Ditto for deuterium. Ditto for FD but, wow... FD has an atomic 
weight of 840 amu. That's almost 7 times more massive than the Higgs, and 
extremely stable. It is probably superconductive as well, but that is a guess.

      Thus, FD would be a massive boson in a perfect sphere containing nuclear 
active isotopes and possibly superconductive, and one more feature - in the 
size range of many excitons.

      Of course, there are larger Fullerenes (in amu) but carbon alone has high 
nuclear stability so having lots of deuterium present could make this 
hyper-boson most interesting for fusion ... say as a target for ICF... or even 
for implosion by SPP. Who knows?

      FD-CF or FD-ICF ... take your pick.

      You heard it first on Vortex... :)



Reply via email to