Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
> Your assessment may vary, but the pluses of > [the Cravens experiment] are: that it is simple, understated, essentially > unpowered, solid state, > robust, long-running, well-constructed, and the error possibilities are > greatly reduced. > > IOW it is "elegant" to the extreme. The highest compliment that can be > leveled at any breakthrough experiment in LENR is "elegance." > It is pretty good. Right up there with F&P's boil-off experiments. In terms of believably it rivals McKubre, which was a more sophisticated but perhaps not as elegant. The one thing it lacks is a way to estimate the anomalous power output. This can be fixed. You could put a resistance heater in the dummy sphere. Or in another sphere. You power up the dummy sphere until the temperature reaches the level of the active sphere. I would like to see Dennis try this. (Hint, hint!) - Jed
