I will answer the other two, but I also hope that you will attempt to
understand some Nanoplasmonics. Just read the intro, and concentrate on how
hot spots work. Please....I need more targets.


On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for a bit about your background, I appreciate that. But you still
> have two more to go before the toll is paid I'm afraid.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ok, I will pay your price so here is #2
>>
>> * Do you have a background in science, a self-taught amateur, or
>> somewhere in between? I don't think it's fair to be completely anonymous
>> when putting forth some sort of grand unified TOE.*
>>
>> I have a degree in physics, but make a living as a system engineer. I
>> specialize in reverse engineering old system's where all info about
>> how they work and what they do has been lose to the ravages of time. I
>> study such systems  in order to upgrade them to a new and/or higher level
>> of technology.
>>
>> The skill set that I have perfected over many years  is a great help
>> in connecting the dots. I believe I can connect the dots with the best of
>> them. A systems engineer is a generalist and a good one will
>> become competent or expert is any technology that is required to understand
>> how a given system works.
>>
>> As a paranoid, I am afraid of Putin. When Putin finds out that the LENR
>> GUT has destroyed his dreams, his friends, and is removing him from power,
>> he will be pissed and being unknown to him for as long as possible is
>> reassuring to me.
>>
>> And there are many centers of power like Putin.
>>
>> Rossi has said that he has  protection. I think that he does but I surly
>> don't.
>>
>> The more people who know how LENR works, the more targets there will be
>> during the big reveal. But no one is willing to take that path. I want more
>> target so I am not the only one. Any volunteers?
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I know you can explain them away. That's not much of an accomplishment.
>>> Are you going to take the time to answer the other three questions I posed
>>> to you before we go off on this tangent?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are you referencing a transition to a BEC state in NiH-LENR, something
>>>> which is far from conclusive or self-evident? BEC theories like Kim's or
>>>> Takahashi's, even though I find them attractive, still confront a number of
>>>> problems as you probably know.
>>>>
>>>> Great, let us talk about these problems. I don't see problems. I bet I
>>>> can explain away these problems. Please give be a shot at that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> OK...you sort of lost me. What are you getting at exactly? It doesn't
>>>>> contradict what I wrote in the slightest. Yeah, fermions & bosons play
>>>>> different roles in nuclear process, in all processes actually -- so what?
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you referencing a transition to a BEC state in NiH-LENR, something
>>>>> which is far from conclusive or self-evident? BEC theories like Kim's or
>>>>> Takahashi's, even though I find them attractive, still confront a number 
>>>>> of
>>>>> problems as you probably know.
>>>>>
>>>>> One can just as easily picture a more general process (as I
>>>>> just highlighted in two different hot fusion systems), absent of different
>>>>> phase transitions, occurring across different LENR systems. Based on the
>>>>> evidence so far, I think at best it could be argued that there a draw
>>>>> exists between the two points of view.
>>>>>
>>>>> I appreciate you clearing up any confusions. Take care.
>>>>>
>>>>> John
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>   *From:* Foks0904 .
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> …But in many cases, under the umbrella of a general process, such as
>>>>>> traditional nuclear reactions, despite the difference, the different
>>>>>> isotopes all tend to follow the same general script in terms of how a
>>>>>> reaction path progresses and generates effects.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not so! Bosons are very different from Fermions – profoundly
>>>>>> different when it comes to nuclear interaction.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Enough said?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to