OK...you sort of lost me. What are you getting at exactly? It doesn't contradict what I wrote in the slightest. Yeah, fermions & bosons play different roles in nuclear process, in all processes actually -- so what?
Are you referencing a transition to a BEC state in NiH-LENR, something which is far from conclusive or self-evident? BEC theories like Kim's or Takahashi's, even though I find them attractive, still confront a number of problems as you probably know. One can just as easily picture a more general process (as I just highlighted in two different hot fusion systems), absent of different phase transitions, occurring across different LENR systems. Based on the evidence so far, I think at best it could be argued that there a draw exists between the two points of view. I appreciate you clearing up any confusions. Take care. John On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > *From:* Foks0904 . > > > > …But in many cases, under the umbrella of a general process, such as > traditional nuclear reactions, despite the difference, the different > isotopes all tend to follow the same general script in terms of how a > reaction path progresses and generates effects. > > > > Not so! Bosons are very different from Fermions – profoundly different > when it comes to nuclear interaction. > > > > Enough said? > > > > > > >
