For the simple reason that even if you assumed that the titanium powder was
oxidized chemically, it would still not account for the energy. It was clear
that titanium was not being oxidized; else you are left with the conundrum on
why it is not being consumed or why it would oxidize so readily in an argon
envelope.
It is indeed a distraction.
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 2:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is the SunCell a titanium burner?
Speculation about titanium is a distraction, for it is not involved in the
chemistry of the SunCell.
How So? Can you expand on this point?
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Mike Carrell <mi...@medleas.com> wrote:
Optical instruments to quantitatively measure the radiant energy are
standard lab equipment and can be calibrated to NIST standards. Speculation
about titanium is a distraction, for it is not involved in the chemistry of the
SunCell.
Mike Carrell
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 1:53 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is the SunCell a titanium burner?
Another thing that would have helped would be to trigger a chemical
explosion with a known amount of explosive, to calibrate.
- Jed
________________________________________________________________________
This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T. Department.
