To find where the Sun Cell power is coming from, experimental procedure as
follows:

Test the power of the electric arch only,

Then, add the TiCl2 and measure the power output.

Then add water is small steps and measure the associated power output
increase.




On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Jojo Iznart <jojoiznar...@gmail.com> wrote:

>  yea, there's oxygen from H20, but isn't the real question be "how much?"
>
> Maybe you can do the math and compute the amount of oxygen and then
> estimate the amount of titanium and then add 2 and 2 together and figure
> out if there is enough chemical energy to explain the huge explosion.
>
> For that matter, can you think of any substance that would produce that
> level of explosion and blinding light from such miniscule amount?
>
>
>
> Jojo
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
> *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 29, 2014 3:37 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Is the SunCell a titanium burner?
>
>  *Mills remarked that there is no oxygen available.*
>
> In the 20,000C plasma blast, the water will decompose into h2 and O. SO
> there is oxygen.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>  Mike Carrell <mi...@medleas.com> wrote:
>>
>>   Optical instruments to quantitatively measure the radiant energy are
>>> standard lab equipment and can be calibrated to NIST standards.
>>>
>>
>> This is a bomb calorimeter. I do not think it incorporates optical
>> instruments. (A schematic of the calorimeter would have helped.) Plus, even
>> when you use NIST calibrated instruments, you should still calibrate.
>> Especially during a demonstration. It would not have taken long to set off
>> a small charge of some explosive. Or thermite.
>>
>>
>>
>>>  Speculation about titanium is a distraction, for it is not involved in
>>> the chemistry of the SunCell.
>>>
>>
>> Well, we should speculate about whatever chemicals were in the explosion.
>> Mills remarked that there is no oxygen available. That is a start. But what
>> was there, and how much energy can it produce? And can we be sure the bomb
>> calorimeter is working, without a calibration?
>>
>> The purpose of a demonstration is to teach the audience. To answer
>> questions. To persuade. It should simplify and clarify what is happening.
>> It cannot be full experiment that answers every question. It should be
>> simple, covering limited ground, because the audience cannot learn much in
>> one hour.
>>
>> - Jed
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to