NASA's The PLASMA-BREACH Torus-Eye sub-singularity reactor is MACRO-QUANTUM
ENTANGLEMENT. NASA's 'IMPOSSIBLE SPACE DRIVE merely proves Trans-Spectrum
Einstein-Rosen TORUS EYE-BREACH bleed through from (PROVEN) AexoDarkEnergy
Parallel-Adjacent hyperspace aka THE~Quantum~BACK OF THE TAPESTRY. . .
Accessing HYPERFLUIDIC/HYPERSPEEDDENSE/Hyper-Gravionically Dynamic bleed
through Aexo-Dark-Hyper-Space simply allows us to focus/control
hyper-gravity POINT LEAD DRIVE ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS. . .  Oh ye of
little 'faith' aka TRANS-TORSION Einstein-Teslian IMAGING ABILITIES.

PER EINSTEIN:  Speed plus Density=Gravity CONTROLS TIME and surrounding
AEXODARKHyperSPACE=equals SpookyAction/QuantumEntanglement HYPERSPEED @
VIRTUAL NO DISTANCE/VIRTUAL NO TIME hypergravion TACHYONIC-SUPER-FLUID
speed/density hyperspace.

EINSTEIN LEFT>>>>> M=EC^2  on his desk. . . the key to UBIQUITOUS QUANTUM
ENTANGLEMENT. . . . AE TachyonicSuper-Fluid Aexo HyperSpace's
BAE//BaseAmbientEnergy level IS TACHYONIC-SUPER-FLUID. . .

NASA's TESLA INDUCED Bose Einstein Super Conductor TORUS RING transspectrum
TACHYONIC-SUPER-FLUID eye-bleed-through reactors GET THE JOB DONE NICELY. .
. .

* * * FOR EXAMPLE:  Identicle Twins are QUANTUM-ENTANGLED. . . via
Torsion-Wave  TRANS HYPERSPACE Spooky Action the same as nano sub-atomic
particles and our QUANTUM-ENTANGLED CEREBRAL CORTEX'S. . . . but to what
The Tesla's, Einsteins, etc are Trans-Torsion CEREBRAL-NEURON Quantum
Entangled to. . . . oh yea it's all obvious now. . .
CROP CIRCLES. . .

* * * And that's why they think on the Multi SIDES OF THE
QUANTUM-AEXO-HYPERSPACE TransTorsion Matrix-Super-M-Brane. . .
WHILE OTHER FLAT-NON-TORSION minds refusing to think-ponder-transtorsion
DELVE/explore/CONCSCIOUSNESS BEYOND the veil of
the 'tapestry 'HAVE MORE DIFFICULTY THINKING IN A TRANS-TORSION GESTALT. .
. aka ludites.

As my young daughter puts it:  "DUH//are we WAKING-UP & GETTING THIS YET? !
?"

* * * Just keep laughing while you break out the champagne. . . Einstein
called TRANSDIMENSIONAL QUANTUM-ENTANGLEMENT RELATIVITY the final phase of
General and Special Relativity. . .

Prof. AE deserves another NOBEL at the very least. . .  A sadly Steven
Hawking & Associates never quite MADE the NECCESSARY QUANTUM LEAP.  Way too
many 'lazy' minds happy to parrot and ride his coat-tails. . .

EINSTEIN's TRANSDIMENSIONAL RELATIVITY successfull PREDICTED EVERYTHING
THAT HUBBLE online would DISCOVER  & esp.  the ACCELERATING GALAXIES to
light speed to ALL be RE-ENVELOPED in surrounding AEXO-DARK-HYPER SPACE and
SAUL PERLMUTTER discovered ALL OF THE MEGA-GAMMA RAY BURSTERS at the
GALACTIC 'SKIN'-border to AEXOSPACE as @ LIGHT SPEED all the Proton eye
SINGULARITIES and GALACTIC HUB SINGULARITES go BLACK-PHASE and RE-INGRESS
all theire E nergy
back into AEXODARK Parent Adjacent-Parallel HYPERSPACE. . . .

SORRY PROF. HAWKING there is NO BIG CRUNCH. . . . THE BIG BANG
PLASMA-BREACH WHITE HOLE Centre of our BUBBLE UNIVERSE remains open as a
GRAND CENTRAL INGRESS AEXO-PLASMA FOUNTAIN. . . .

EINSTEIN STILL GETS THE CREDITY from where he QUANTUM
ENTANGLED/Trans-TORSION RELOCATED to  for . . . .SUCCESSFULL ARTICULATION
of the Unified Field Theory. . .

~:^D     Give the Profs. Einstein & Tesla a transtorsion-wave 'call' to
verify. . . but probably JUST BELIEVING NASA will suffice.

FOSTER GAMBLE'S THRIVE.COM DVE graphics are PRETTY GOOD along these lines
aka ZPE/Feyman/Podkletnov/Evgengy Nickitin & ANTONOV aka Russia's
Aethyer-Transdimesional HYPER GRAVITY StarGate Project/Andy Yeong
Wei.a.Wu-Boeing Phantom Works/R.A. Ned Allen-Lockheed Martin Skunk
Words/John Brandenburg-Orbitic/John Beyster SAIC-CIAS etc. Etc. . ETC . .

! ! ! DUH. . . . Follow the money.  JHO cuz $talks AND Right THEORY
produces HARD SCIENCE produces HARD TECHNOLOGY and everything else. . . .
WALKS. . .




On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> part of the current tragedy of science is all kind of mainstream media
> http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJcoldfusion.pdf#page=4
> first of all scientific journalists, then science tabloid (science,
> nature, Cells), then influential mainstream media (NYT)...
>
> don't look further, consensus is manufactured. see recent affairs...
> WMD is just de detail if you compare to current manufacture of consensus.
>
> cold fusion fiasco is an example of something I see recently and that CIA
> have well theorized, if you lie at the beginning of an affair, it became
> the consensus.
>
> for a mainstream story like a crash you have to lie for 24h and media
> follow...
> for science 2month is enough.
>
> then no evidence can change the truth of the journalists.
>
> NO EVIDENCE CAN!
> except the one that reach the heart of each citizen independently, and
> based on his selfish interest or concrete observation.
> the tea kettle fallacy is the only truth.
>
>
> 2014-08-02 17:23 GMT+02:00 Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com>:
>
> What a surprise : Jennifer Ouellette  comes out against it
>> Physics Week in Review: August 2, 2014
>> http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cocktail-party-physics/2014/08/02/physics-week-in-review-august-2-2014/
>> Perhaps your interest was piqued by the news that a Fuel-Less Space
>> Drive with “Q-Thrusters”
>> <http://www.popsci.com/article/technology/fuel-less-space-drive-may-actually-work-says-nasa>
>> May Actually Work, meaning that it might one day be possible to travel
>> through space without filling up the gas tank, so to speak. Per Wired
>> <http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-07/31/nasa-validates-impossible-space-drive>:
>> “Either the results are completely wrong, or NASA has confirmed a major
>> breakthrough in space propulsion.”  The Time Lord’s money is on the latter.
>> Via Twitter, he declared that the notion of “Propulsive momentum transfer
>> via the quantum vacuum virtual plasma” is nonsensical sub-*Star-Trek*
>> level technobabble <http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140006052>. (You
>> may as well put your faith in “Red Matter.”)
>>
>> But I think she has a typo ... "The Time Lord’s money is on the latter."
>> -- where "latter" is "breakthrough".
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to