Jack, Take this quiz and get back to me...
http://darkmattersalot.com/2013/11/21/are-you-smarter-than-a-5th-grader-who-is-smarter-than-einstein/ On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:56 PM, JackHarbach O'Sullivan <alset9te...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes: Paradox indicates that our 3D logic parameters indeed only 'seem' to > elicite paradox since we are simultaneously(via transtemperal Casimir > destortions) NEEDING TO CROSS CORRELATE seeming 'Through the Looking Glass' > A-Dark Tachyonic Super Fluid. > > *Ha* CROSS CORRELATING a hypothesized DARK ENERGY Tachyonic Super Fluid > parallel space is easier said than done since we have no WALDO to reach > across the PLASMA BREACH whether at nano-level or at MACRO REACTOR LEVEL. . > . > > AT THE CASIMIR BORDER > > > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Roarty, Francis X > <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: >> >> On Sunday August 3 Jack said [snip] * * * FOR EXAMPLE: Identicle Twins >> are QUANTUM-ENTANGLED. . . via Torsion-Wave TRANS HYPERSPACE Spooky Action >> the same as nano sub-atomic particles and our QUANTUM-ENTANGLED CEREBRAL >> CORTEX'S. [/snip] >> >> >> >> Jack, I believe Paradox twins experience the same difference in space time >> as exotic forms of hydrogen experience when suppressed by changes in nano >> geometry / lattice defects or tapestries of cavities formed when bulk >> conductive nano powders are packed together. Some day the relationship >> between the Casimir formula and the time dilation formula will be proved… I >> also think the magnetic field will be corralled into this such that the >> missing parameter in these anomalous claims is finally visible.. I think the >> Sawyer endorsement by NASA may mean there is a magnetic/geometrical >> component that we are missing –Many researchers endorse resonance in these >> cavities but could the macro shape of the reactor itself be part of the >> puzzle as to why some experiments are so hard to reproduce? Maybe it is time >> to shotgun the parameters in our search for results with identical powders >> in a dozens of reactor shapes and even the pill used to form the powders in >> different shapes. I have always posited that the anomalous energy comes from >> plying different forces at different scales of nature against herself to >> perform work on the gas atoms loaded into the metal lattice or powders- >> previously I thought the quantum averages of geometrical regions that form a >> tapestry were in opposition to the “randomness” of gas motion.. that is to >> say random motion becomes usable energy when you can restrain any spatial >> axis on a small enough scale –which physics teaches us you can’t in the >> normal 3d isotropy –BUT- Paradox twins are an example of 2 different >> inertial frames where the 3D spatial frames are rotated from each other >> causing time dilation from each other’s perspective, IF an equal difference >> in vacuum pressure can be created via suppression in the nano regions >> created by these powders then you have random motion that is spatially >> unbalanced allowing for random motion to be harnessed / preventing >> cancellation in our dimension but changing the vector of virtual particles >> exiting our plane. >> >> Fran >> >> > >
