Another pleasing idea is that there is a great energy gain mechanism at play associated with muon catalized fusion. An investment of just a few MeV of magnetic energy can produce an average fusion yield of 150 reactions per emitted muon.
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > My previous belief in magnetic formation of gluon/quark plasma formation > could not explain how such a high energy reaction could take place in very > low energy conditions like the Cravins ball. > > The muon catalyzed fusion modal is a better fit for the low energy LENR > collection of dots. > > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The theory of muon catalyzed fusion (MCF) is similar in concept to what >> Piantelli proposes. But MCF will result in proton proton (PP) fusion. The >> end reaction products of PP fusion is primarily light elements like boron >> and beryllium. This has been seen in the ash assay results from DGT. >> >> PP fusion will also explain why Piantelli sees proton pairs in his >> reaction cycle combining with nickel to produce copper. >> >> >> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> This theory can be verified by the detection of a large increase in the >>> numbers of muon neutrinos exiting the Ni/H reactor. >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> A well recognize feature of LENR is the rapid or sometimes almost >>>> instantaneous stabilization of radioactive elements. >>>> >>>> This LENR mechanism is central to the way LENR can produce energy >>>> through an extreme range from megawatts to milliwatts. >>>> >>>> One of the toughest LENR riddles to answer is as follows: ‘how can the >>>> meltdown of a Ni/H reactor be caused by the same process that produces one >>>> watt of output in the Cravins golden ball.’ >>>> >>>> The mechanism that provides this vast range of power generation >>>> intensity is tunneling. >>>> >>>> It is clear that the application of a magnetic field can increase the >>>> rate of radioactive decay in isotopes by orders of magnitude. >>>> This same mechanism can work inside protons and neutrons to increase >>>> the production of virtual mesons. >>>> >>>> To set the stage, the three quarks inside a proton live inside a very >>>> small volume. This quantum confinement box defines the constraints imposed >>>> on the uncertainty of the trio of quarks by limiting the range in their >>>> position to a high degree. Through the uncertainty principle, this means >>>> that the variable maximum virtual energy that this fixed position produces >>>> is very large. >>>> >>>> The virtual quark inside the proton is jumping around inside its >>>> tunneling confinement box with great vigor. >>>> >>>> But the energy level to produce a meson is also high at 140 MeV. So >>>> without some help a meson is not produced by virtual particle production. >>>> >>>> But when a magnetic field is applied to the proton, it adds some >>>> kinetic energy to the quark dance. This pushes up the floor of the >>>> tunneling confinement box. The degree in which this floor is raised is >>>> proportional to the strength of the magnetic field applied to the proton. >>>> >>>> In a very strong magnetic field, the virtual meson jumps out of the >>>> confinement box very often because the floor of the box is raised very >>>> high. Many mesons are produced that eventually decay to muons that catalyze >>>> hydrogen fusion. >>>> >>>> When the magnetic field is weak as in the case of the Cravins ball, >>>> very few meson get out of the confinement box and the muon catalyzed fusion >>>> level is very small. But fusion still goes on because that small amount of >>>> extra magnetic energy is just enough to produce some small amounts of >>>> fusion. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
