Actually my friend, if the hotcat is operating the way I speculate, Rossi does
not have to worry about the sintering. Since, the NAE would be floating blobs
of nickel nanoparticles which may be partially melted. He needs to use "bumpy"
"sea-urchin" microparticles precisely for the reason I speculate. The tips
break off as nanoparticles and serve as the NAE.
The problem is with your theory. You are speculating a mechanism of
nanoantennas which I am trying to point to you is not correct. Because your
nanoantenna will sinter and be destroyed. Do not attempt to confuse the issue
by conflating your theory with what is known about the hotcat from the Levi
TIP1 report. Quite obviously, your theory is NOT how the hotcat operates so
suggesting that the hotcat is "proof" of your theory and asking me to accept
that your theory is how the hotcat operates is way beyond arrogant, my friend.
How can you even begin to suggest a theory and then use the HotCat as proof of
your theory? That absolutely boggles the mind that you would suggest that.
And why would you say the nickel does not sinter? Are you still clinging to
your "metaphasic shielding" explanation that the BEC is shielding the
nanostructures from high temps?
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:JANAP 128..Kudos...the Axil Enigma
This nickel preservation question is part of the design of the Ni/H reactor
as Rossi has let slip. Rossi says that his reactor is now running at 1000C He
said in the past that he used bumpy microparticles.
Ask Rossi why his nickel does not sinter. By the way, it does not sinter,
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Jojo Iznart <jojoiznar...@gmail.com> wrote:
That part I understand my friend, what I don't understand is how you can
even begin to claim that. Is the mouse operating at under 300C? Because that
is the beginning sintering point of nickel nanoparticles. (In fact, there is
reason to believe sintering occurs at temps lower than this.)
But, I do not believe the mouse is operating at 300C or less; nor is the
cat. Both appear to be thermally coupled and hence would be operating at at
least 700C based on the Levi TIP1 report.
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:JANAP 128..Kudos...the Axil Enigma
I have posted more than once, that if the control system of the reactor
keeps the reactor temperature under the sintering temperature of the nickel
nanostuctures, the nickel particles will be safe.
Is that hard to understand?
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Jojo Iznart <jojoiznar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
My friend, this is your proof???? I've studied these docs before.
These are all speculations. No proof here.
But In fact, I've done more than you to try replicate some of these
ideas. I've actually built a contraption for replicating some of it. Much
more than I can say for you. Please correct me if I'm wrong on this count.
And BTW, my friend, I never pretended to be comparable to Tesla. In
fact, I am openly admitting that I am not smart enough, educated enough to
understand what you are speculating, except that I see a big problem with your
theory that you seem to be unwilling to address. Please address my sintering,
melting root problem and we can move on to the other more esoteric parts of
your theory.
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:JANAP 128..Kudos...the Axil Enigma
Axil followed suit with elaborate explanations of carbon
nanoparticles causing LENR, etc. etc.
See
Fusion by Pseudo-Particles
Part 1
http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part1.pdf
Part 2
http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part2.pdf
Part 3
http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part3.pdf
See tesla's carbon button lamp in part 1. I think you are no tesla.
