here's 2 reports to chew on.  good luck digesting them.  it doesn't even
reach back to the the fraudulent emails from ipcc yet.

Dishonest global warming reports are good, as long as they promote certain
agenda, paper says
<http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2014/07/dishonest-global-warming-reports-are-good-as-long-as-they-promote-certain-agenda-paper-says/>
By Neilio <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/author/neilio/> on July 12, 2014
in Bad Policy <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/bad-policy/>,
ClimateGate <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/climategate/>,
Corruption <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/corruption/>,
Extremists <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/extremists/>, Fascism
<http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/fascism/>, IPCC
<http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/ipcc/>, Junk Science
<http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/junk-science/>, Science
<http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/science/>, World Governance
<http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/world-governance/>

by: J. D. Heyes.  (NaturalNews) According to a pair of economists who have
recently published a peer-reviewed paper in the American Journal of
Agricultural Economics, lying about climate change in order to advance an
extremist environmental agenda is a great idea.As reported by Breitbart
News, the authors — Assistant Professors of Economics Fuhai Hong and
Xiaojian Zhao […]
 Continue Reading
<http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2014/07/dishonest-global-warming-reports-are-good-as-long-as-they-promote-certain-agenda-paper-says/>
57
<http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2014/07/dishonest-global-warming-reports-are-good-as-long-as-they-promote-certain-agenda-paper-says/#comments>
[image: James Delingpole]
<http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2014/05/leading-climate-scientist-defects-no-longer-believes-in-the-consensus/>
Leading
Climate Scientist Defects: No Longer Believes in the ‘Consensus’
<http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2014/05/leading-climate-scientist-defects-no-longer-believes-in-the-consensus/>
By Dan McGrath <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/author/dan-mcgrath/> on May
8, 2014 in Climate History
<http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/climate-history/>, Failed
predictions <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/failed-predictions/>,
IPCC <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/ipcc/>, Michael Mann
<http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/michael-mann/>, Mythical
Consensus <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/mythical-consensus/>

By James Delingpole – One of the world’s most eminent climate scientists –
for several decades a warmist – has defected to the climate sceptic camp.
Lennart Bengtsson – a Swedish climatologist, meteorologist, former director
of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg and winner, in 2006,
of the 51st IMO Prize of the […]





On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If it's all about science and scholarship then why did the IPCC get caught
>> fraudulently changing the data when it showed a cooling trend?
>>
>
> That is nonsense. It resembles assertions that cold fusion researchers
> committed fraud. There is no fraud in global warming or cold fusion. There
> are only experts who understand what they are doing, and ignorant critics
> yelling "fraud."
>
> - Jed
>
>

Reply via email to