On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> H Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> It is well known fact that experimenters can be honest and competent but >> because of their bias they can still unwittingly influence the outcome of >> an experiment which is why blind and double blind experiments are sometimes >> necessary. >> > > This was a blind test. The three groups measuring the helium had no idea > what the history of each experiment was, or whether it produced excess > heat. He also sent them samples of lab air an other samples unrelated to > the experiments. The flask labels were coded. > > This part I knew. I wasn't sure if knew before hand which cell was going to be active, but you made that clear that he could not have known. > Miles knew the history of the samples, but he did not tell the groups > operating the mass spectrometers. > > Miles described this in his papers, and I described it in my review: > > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJintroducti.pdf > > I suggest you review the review. > will do. Harry > > - Jed > >
