I don't see how it challenge F&P, it is theory? 2014-09-28 2:34 GMT+02:00 H Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com>:
> > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 5:42 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > >> In reply to H Veeder's message of Wed, 24 Sep 2014 23:04:12 -0400: >> Hi Harry, >> [snip] >> >Since we are dealing in impossibilities from the outset, it seems like >> >false logic to argue that the probability of endothermic reactions >> >is improbable. >> [snip] >> I have told you what I think and why. Whether or not you choose to accept >> it is >> up to you. >> >> Regards, >> >> Robin van Spaandonk >> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >> >> > > I found this drawing on a site which happened to be extremely critical of > P&F's research. > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OpDKkgdQKrgP29Nxa0N_biIsLz0qeY8UGDGpFJCFSy0/edit?usp=sharing > > What I like about the drawing is that it shows the three d-d fusion > pathways all passing​ through the same intermediate stage of high energy > helium 4. I modified the drawing to show the reaction going in both > directions before the excited intermediate stage has a chance to decay. I > think that the lattice facilitates the initiation of fusion but it also > tends to inhibits the completion the fusion process. The question of course > is of what relevancy is this scenario if it does not produce energy? If it > can form an epicatalytic > process then it is very relevant. > > > Harry > >
