From: "Bob Cook" <frobertc...@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 2:40:42 PM
The authors suggest it allows compliance with conservation of energy, charge in integral units, momentum and angular momentum and spin. Alan--What do you think it defies? Bob JOKE! (See Motls, Pomp, Siegel et al) -- I WAS going to add "because there is no experimental evidence for it" But the paper was quite well received (10 citations). http://scholar.google.com/scholar?espv=2&biw=1124&bih=939&bav=on.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.78597519,d.cGU&ion=1&um=1&ie=UTF-8&lr=&cites=5348392371497276203 eg http://fs.gallup.unm.edu/~smarandache/PiP-2008-03.pdf#page=72 (Progress in Physics) It also points out the the "literature equation" (1) p + v -> n + e+ is WRONG and can't be corrected, because the quarks don't add up right.
