I agree with much of what you are saying Eric. The other group is just as likely to be wrong in their interpretation as well since so few particles have been seen. How is it possible for anyone to state with confidence that a newly found particle of a certain mass has anything at all to do with the masses of other particles? Where is the proof of that theory?
It will take many years to demonstrate within an experiment a connection of this complexity and many of us will be long gone before that happens. I remain a skeptic until much better evidence is presented. It is time to get off the soap box! Dave -----Original Message----- From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sun, Nov 9, 2014 3:44 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:CERN and NO Higggs Particle Nov 7 2014 On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 10:07 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: It has been my suspicion all along that these guys jumped to a conclusion much too quickly. I share your skepticism about the discovery of the Higgs boson. But I'm also skeptical about the claim of this team that there is another interpretation. There is always another interpretation. Glancing at the article, I'm guessing they had an alternative proposal that did not gain traction, and now they're hoping to make the case that the announcement was premature. Judging from what I've learned watching LENR, theorists will never agree, and there is nothing one can do to help them agree. Even when there is evidence staring them in the face that there's something else going on. They appear to be very stubborn people. Eric
