Axil, he may be responding to the postings that I produced which outline how a
thermally controlled device might operate. Knowing how the various tradeoffs
interact should allow the competition to save themselves a lot of
experimentation. Perhaps my simulations are beginning to match what he is
finding?
The pieces of the puzzle continue to fall into place and now I have a couple of
models that both show the same results. The third party test curve of output
power versus input step power shows what I would expect when internal thermal
positive feedback is present at a modest COP. Even his operation with PWM
drive makes sense according to my computer model.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Thu, Nov 20, 2014 1:00 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Who could it be???
Marco Serra
November 20th, 2014 at 2:51 AM
Dear Andrea,
you said that “We cannot feed more information to our competition, which now
is very powerful”. My question is: how can any competitor be powerful without
knowing the core effect that drive the ECat ? Do you know of any lab that
succeded in replication of the Rossi Effect even in a minimal part ?
God bless you
Marco
Andrea Rossi
November 20th, 2014 at 7:26 AM
Marco Serra:
Yes.
Warm Regards
A.R.
It can't be Godes. His reactor is original and not like the E-Cat. Come on
Jed... tell us who1
