Hi Benjamin. Great news that you can work on the debian packages!
Current development is not yet ready for release, but we won't be doing any file
reorganization I don't think so you could use it to get the packages set up,
maybe we could put up a "snapshot version" if you want, but once it's ready to
release they'd be ready to go.
One thing you might notice is that things are divided into a few binary
packages, but could be divided further. I.e. we oughtto have seperate
packagesfor:
vos-corelibs:
libvos
libvutil
libvip
vos-metaobjects:
libmetaobject_misc
libmetaobject_a3dl
libmetaobject_ircbridge?
libmetaobject_services?
vos-extensions:
(these would mainly be depended upon by omnivos plugins but should also be
seperately installable for other "server" type programs to use)
libvosext_fspersist
libvosext_http
libvosext_revcontrol
libvosext_sqlpersist
omnivos
omnivos-plugins:
(though ones without dependencies could be included with the
omnivos packages I guess)
omnivos-plugin-avatarfactory: libomniplg_avatar_factory
omnivos-plugin-fspersist: libomniplg_fspersist
omnivos-plugin-hypervos: libomniplg_hypervos
omnivos-plugin-ircbridge: libomniplg_ircbridge ??
omnivos-plugin-logctrl: libomniplg_logctrl
omnivos-plugin-search: libomniplg_search
omnivos-plugin-services: libomniplg_services ??
omnivos-plugin-talkative: libomniplg_talkative
mesh
wxterangreal
This is kind a lot I guess but they are seperate due to dependencies (both
external libraries and within the VOS project).
Reed
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 02:43:10PM +0800, Lalo Martins wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:09:56 +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> > Would you suggest to package 0.23 or a checkout the current development
> > version (is it stable)? When is 0.24 scheduled to be be released (one of
> > Peters messages suggested at the earliest in Oct.)?
>
> Current development is certainly not stable yet.
>
> Isn't 0.23 already packaged though? :-) Of course I think you're welcome
> to make any corrections you deem necessary according to current debian
> policies to it, then upload it to Debian.
>
> > The debian package for bazaar said, that it is no longer maintained
> > upstream, however, bzr-ng did not say such a thing. Is bzr still alive?
>
> Yes, very alive :-) bazaar-1 (baz) is no longer maintained because focus
> has switched to bazaar-ng (bzr, soon bazaar-2). Check
> http://www.bazaar-vcs.org/
>
> best,
> Lalo Martins
> --
> So many of our dreams at first seem impossible,
> then they seem improbable, and then, when we summon the will, they
> soon become inevitable.
> --
> personal: http://www.laranja.org/ technical:
> http://lalo.revisioncontrol.net/ GNU: never give up
> freedom http://www.gnu.org/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> vos-d mailing list
> vos-d@interreality.org
> http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d
_______________________________________________
vos-d mailing list
vos-d@interreality.org
http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d
