on Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:50:09AM -0800, Bill Kendrick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 09:06:08AM +0000, Karsten M. Self wrote: > <snip> > > > > Create a new layer. Make it white. Merge with your existing > > transparent layer (that's what the checkerboard represents), or delete > > the transparent layer. Or leave it... > > There's no "transparent layer." Every single one of his layers now have > transparency.
I realized that when I looked at the image itself. My point (as you explained in another post) was that, if there is transparency in all layers, then the portion of the image corresponding to a transparent region in *all* layers will be transparent. Adding a white layer to the bottom of the stack will make the image opaque. > It's like he was given a sheet of white paper, and then he added some > sheets of cellophane on top of them. > > Now he suddenly has a bigger desk to draw on, but none of his cellophane > (or the white paper at the bottom) have been made bigger. Right. Your "resize layer to canvas" trick was one I hadn't been aware of. I learned something. Peace. -- Karsten M. Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Geek for hire: http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech