On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 09:00:07AM +0800, Mark's tech help wrote: > On 9/12/2015 at 2:06 PM, "Wes Hardaker" <wjhns...@hardakers.net> wrote: > >I still use it? Because it's wedged into my muscle memory and nothing > >else has shown me I need to move away from it to something better > >(unlike many other instances where I have moved to something better, > >such as bash, python, and emacs [/me ducks and runs for cover]) > > hmmr.. so let be sure on this-- you've moved *away* from these 3? And here > I've just taken a half-assed plunge into an online MIT course, "Introduction > to Computer Science and Programming Using Python" .. (was a little > distressed when Big Brother's own product, Chrome, was at the top of > suggested browsers.. and of course the forums are full of Winblows > boneheads.) Anyways, I do recall having read negative viewpoints on Python > from purist coders' perspectives.. would y'all suggest I just return to the > K&R C of my school daze?
No. C is a nasty language. Use Eiffel instead! -- Brian Lavender http://www.brie.com/brian/ "There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies." Professor C. A. R. Hoare The 1980 Turing award lecture _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
