> My logic, which I'm apparently isn't able to express clearly, is, that
> if neither MSIE or Netscape support a special graphic format, then very
> few web sites will have such images. If I was a company paying somebody
> else to make my homepage, then they wouldn't get paid if the suckers had
> included graphics that can only be viewed on Amiga-only browser.
>
> Whether we like it or not, then the standard is set by MSIE and Netscape
> because most of the world use these. And then rather than wasting his
> time implementing some arbitrary graphic format, I think Olli should
> use his time on issues of more importance to us, e.g. JavaScript, CSS
> etc. etc.
>
> But if the format is supported by Netscape/MSIE then it should definitely
> be supported by Voyager, and then Olli should add it to his TODO list.
I don't think anythig was actually wrong with the logic... actually,
it wasn't really a question of logic (I apologize - I was in a bad
mood when I wrote that message and it probably shows...) - All I meant
was that it is supposedly an extension to JPEG that more than 1 camera
support (most likely a new compression algorithm so that they can
store more pictures) so it should be able to be viewed by V and Amiga
datatypes.
Like I said in my original message - my friend said some others
couldn't see the pictures either (Netscape and MSIE users) - but I was
at work when he showed me the site, and we were using Netscape, so it
is apparently supported at some point by at least Netscape.
--
Amiga 3000 [030/25 - 2.1GB - 2MB Chip - 16MB Fast - Picasso IV]
Since 1985 and still going...
Maybe the case should be pink and fuzzy? 8^}
