> Thankyou :) I really wanted to know if theer
> were others wantying the same feature as well,
> I don't think Olli would implement a feature
> for ONE person.. would he?
>
> D'ya think I should class it as a bug? :)
>
I don't think it's a bug. it's a nyi feature, not a bug.
Current js implementation is not complete...
I'm quite sure V3 being intended to be Js 1.3 compatible
it will be fixed for everybody...
Bout these bug reports, well, does it make sense to continue
to report bugs on Js ? I'm quite sure vapor team already has
a more advanced version than us, plans about what should
be implemented first, and a good knowledge of what's not
implemented and what is... sending bug reports make sense
on a feature that is supposed to be implemented ... but I don't
have such a list.
I may be wrong, but I feel V3 is too early to be considered
as a test version on many topics (especially jscript), cause
we know it's being worked on. I suppose it might be better
to collect url and pages of test when possible
(or even js routines) to help olli's band to check before releasing,
cause reporting that or that site doesn't work ok or crashes
1) might not be true on their current version
2) doesn't help 'bugs' to be grouped together (imagine you have to debug a
browser and have hundreds of url reported not to work ) - anyway jserrorlogs
must be better for this
When there is a more complete version things might turn different...
just my personal feelings.
Phil
____________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - Info & Archive: http://www.vapor.com/
For Listserver Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP"
To Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "UNSUBSCRIBE"
