On Wednesday, 01-Sep-99 at 16:45:54, Michael M. Rye ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> [ Julia Buckney wrote: ]
>> On 02-Sep-99, J�rgen Danielsson had the perspicacity to write, and I
>> quote: "
>> I can't stand AGA myself, but if a user uses
>>> AGA and there's a bug in Voyager do u think it's smart to upgrade it?
>>
>> What's wrong with AGA? It seems Ok to me. But hey, I'm no techie.
>
> I'm still using AGA, as I cannot afford a new accelerator or gfx card
> at the moment.
Just want to chime in and say I'm an AGA dinosaur too!
My next major purchase will be a DKB3128 for yet more ram ;) THEN a
graphics card -- but they're STILL awfully high priced. About $300 US?!?!
c'mon, the _prices_ are what's outdated!
AGA dinosaurs reunite!!! :-)
AGA dinosaur owner,
Brian Haug
--
AMIGA 4000D-Cyberstorm MkIII 060@50 128M-60ns + 18M(70&80ns) on MotherBoard
FFS:43.20b,KS:39.106,WB:39.29 ; DKB4091 - Iomega Zip Plus + 150M Bernoulli
USR Courier(25) & Sportster V.90, GVP ioExtender-v1.8 (reg. Miami 3.2b)
____________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - Info & Archive: http://www.vapor.com/
For Listserver Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP"
To Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "UNSUBSCRIBE"
