>> Yes it works but it's slow and supports only 256 colors. Some pictures
>> on the web uses more colors so that's why it's nice with a gfx-card.
>> Even if AGA supports 256.000 colors WB doesn't support HAM8 so...
>
> Hi J�rgen,
> Hmm, I cruise on 8 colours, graphics off, so another few million is not
> really going to show up :-) But that explains why I do so. Thanks.
Yes... AGA IS fast in few colours. The more colours the slower... With
graphics off it will work just great, I do agree about that. The posotive
side of surfing with graphics on is nicer websites with pictures and
colours. The negative thing is that it's much slower, if calling with a
modem. I have surfed the web with AGA too. I used 256 colours at that time
and everything was slow like scrolling the text. I've tried 64 colours and
it's speed is ok. However... There should be alot of old gfx-cards for sale
now??? CyberGFX and Picasso 96 supports alot of older gfx-cards and those
should be pretty cheap too so why not buy one? I don't know about everyones
personal economic situation out there, but if you use computers you should
have some intrests in getting your computer upgraded for running
web-programs atleast. The Amiga has been around for awhile and gfx-cards
have been created all the time so good 2D-gfxcards should be available for
cheap prices. I don't say that you must buy a gfx-card I'm only trying to
tell you how nice it is compared to AGA. I use AGA for games only. It's
just so much nicer that it feels like a "must-upgrade" if you tried it.
Regards /J�rgen
Sorry Julia but all the things that I wrote about wasn't to you only :o) .
____________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - Info & Archive: http://www.vapor.com/
For Listserver Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP"
To Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "UNSUBSCRIBE"
