I received a message from Chris Wiles, a reply follows,
>> On 30-Mar-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> 
>> Hmm I nearly forgot. There should be PPC image decoders and maybe html
>> parser as well.
> 
> But wasn't it 'proved' that PPC decoders would be no faster (or even a
> little slower) than highly optimised 060 image decoders?

Then why are the WarpJPEG/PNG datatypes much faster than any 68k equivalent?
 Although, ppc decoders should not be a priority IMHO.  A ppc layout engine
on the other hand would be very good, but it depends on the code structure
whether it is feasable or not.

-- 
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.

Gavin Kinsey

____________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - Info & Archive: http://www.vapor.com/
For Listserver Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP"
To Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "UNSUBSCRIBE"

Reply via email to