"Shane Cracknell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RL > Those people who are having the problem should make sure that they
> RL > DON'T have the reply-to: set to their own address.
>
> I have NOT changed any setting at all they are the same as last week and
> the week before
Yes, but that's not inconsistent - if it had been that, then it would've been possible
for it to only start happening recently, because the address might have only become
undeliverable recently.
> Did you read the first mail about this?
> The mail that is being bounce back to me and i belive the same for the
> other is for someone at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, I read all of them.
And your point is...?
That address is clearly one that's on the mailing list.
Delivery failures are supposed to go back to the address that's specified in the
headers.
If you look in the headers of a mail from the list, you'll see that the list adds in:
> Errors-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So delivery failures are supposed to go back there.
Some broken mail servers ignore that and send it back to the reply-to: address that
the original sender has specified.
Actually, looking at it, the list server puts in its reply-to header (though I *seem*
to remember it keeps it if you specify one) although it does also put:
> X-original-sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
as well as putting your address in the from: field.
The server's not returning the error to where it should be, but any of the fields that
has your address in could be the one that it's focussing on...
Rob
____________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - Info & Archive: http://www.vapor.com/
For Listserver Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP"
To Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "UNSUBSCRIBE"
