> > Hope that helps you with your decision.
> > 
> 
> Onestly,no.
> I recived, from list, a lot of kindly answer. 
> In one, tell me to set 200-300 mb of disk cache, in other one 8192K (8megs).
> Which is the right one? ( i've a lot of space on disk, 56k modem, no gfx
> card, 040, OS3.0)

Everybody's needs are different.  The size you choose for your cache
basically depends on how much, how frequently, and how many web sites
you visit.  Are you a web junky?  An infrequent visitor?  Or only
frequent a few constantly changing sites?

I myself spend little time on the web. I only go there when I have a
specific purpose.  I'm a Usenet junky -- 30 or so eclectic groups.
Plus I subscribe to about a half dozen or so mail lists.  Used to
subscribe to an electronic newspaper clipping service -- about 100K
daily, but it got to be too much.

Lately, however, I've been on eBay bidding on items to flesh out a 300
MHz AMD MB and box I was given, that I'll install Linux on.  Since
eBay changes daily, caching a particular page is pointless.  By
tomorrow, it will be different.  Many of the sites I visit change
daily or weekly.  For that reason, and the fact that I may go weeks
without accessing the web, I run a small cache -- 8MB with a 15 day
expire option. Why waste disk space?  For anything I want to save for
future reference, I do a "save as HTML."


-- 
Patrick Bartek
NoLife Polymath Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_____________________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - http://v3.vapor.com/
Voyager FAQ....: http://faq.vapor.com/voyager/
Listserver Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=HELP
Unsubscribe....: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=UNSUBSCRIBE

Reply via email to