> > Hope that helps you with your decision.
> >
>
> Onestly,no.
> I recived, from list, a lot of kindly answer.
> In one, tell me to set 200-300 mb of disk cache, in other one 8192K (8megs).
> Which is the right one? ( i've a lot of space on disk, 56k modem, no gfx
> card, 040, OS3.0)
Everybody's needs are different. The size you choose for your cache
basically depends on how much, how frequently, and how many web sites
you visit. Are you a web junky? An infrequent visitor? Or only
frequent a few constantly changing sites?
I myself spend little time on the web. I only go there when I have a
specific purpose. I'm a Usenet junky -- 30 or so eclectic groups.
Plus I subscribe to about a half dozen or so mail lists. Used to
subscribe to an electronic newspaper clipping service -- about 100K
daily, but it got to be too much.
Lately, however, I've been on eBay bidding on items to flesh out a 300
MHz AMD MB and box I was given, that I'll install Linux on. Since
eBay changes daily, caching a particular page is pointless. By
tomorrow, it will be different. Many of the sites I visit change
daily or weekly. For that reason, and the fact that I may go weeks
without accessing the web, I run a small cache -- 8MB with a 15 day
expire option. Why waste disk space? For anything I want to save for
future reference, I do a "save as HTML."
--
Patrick Bartek
NoLife Polymath Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_____________________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - http://v3.vapor.com/
Voyager FAQ....: http://faq.vapor.com/voyager/
Listserver Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=HELP
Unsubscribe....: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=UNSUBSCRIBE