Hello
> I don't see why I should Give w3.org free advertising by putting one
> of their URLS in there.
Now I do! though I think that its bad practice on their part! (you'll
understand in a minute...)
Basically the W3 site doesnt decide which html format to check the
specs against by the 3.2 or 4.0 or 4.01 part of the DTD - it does it
purely on the URL provided (hence: no url - everything errors).
I found this out cause I added the 4.0 URL into the DTD but change the
DTD itself back to 3.2.
Now with 3.2 the page Im using as a test has NO errors whatsoever but
with the URL pointing to the 4.0 page it did have errors. Although
these are odd in itself as they are perfectly ok attributes:
Line 17, column 34:
... <FRAMESET ROWS="70,*" FRAMEBORDER="0" FRAMESPACING="0" FRAME ...
Error: there is no attribute "FRAMEBORDER"
Line 17, column 51:
... 70,*" FRAMEBORDER="0" FRAMESPACING="0" FRAMEBORDER="no" BORD ...
Error: there is no attribute "FRAMESPACING"
Line 17, column 67:
... R="0" FRAMESPACING="0" FRAMEBORDER="no" BORDER="0">
Error: duplicate specification of attribute "FRAMEBORDER"
Line 17, column 79:
... RDER="0" FRAMESPACING="0" FRAMEBORDER="no" BORDER="0">
Error: there is no attribute "BORDER"
Line 19, column 72:
... 0,*" FRAMEBORDER="0" FRAMESPACING="0" FRAMEBORDER="no" BORDER="0">
Error: duplicate specification of attribute "FRAMEBORDER"
All of these are in my 4.0 html book. all are legal.
Go figure!
TTFN
Biffy
--
Bifford the Youngest
(Sam Byford)
Visit my site:
http://www.photopoetry.co.uk
ICQ: 52983236
-!-
_____________________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - http://v3.vapor.com/
Voyager FAQ....: http://faq.vapor.com/voyager/
Listserver Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=HELP
Unsubscribe....: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=UNSUBSCRIBE
