So I tested in my setup with qemu from git with tags: v2.5.0-rc0 v2.5.0-rc1 v2.5.0 v2.5.1 They all work.
Could you please have a look at the patch and give me some more logs ? VPP with VHOST_USER_DEBUG_SOCKET set to 1 usually helps a lot, as it logs all vhost messages received by VPP. Thanks, - Pierre Le 26 oct. 2016 à 23:45, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : Excellent, thanks Ed! And let’s see … -Maciek On 26 Oct 2016, at 22:40, Edward Warnicke <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Maciek, Looks like the patch was based at a point in the past that was pointing to the old CSIT branch. I rebased the patch, so hopefully it will now pick up the correct CSIT branch. Ed On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: //reduced list, updated subject Peter is right: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/2922/16 looking at the last failed job - https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/1940/consoleFull - it's using old csit branch - "CSIT_BRANCH=oper-161017", without ubuntu1604, so pointless. you should rebase to pick up this commit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/3553/ that's updating to latest csit branch oper-161024. -Maciek On 26 Oct 2016, at 10:06, Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Looks like it is still testing with oper-161017 not oper-161024. + CSIT_BRANCH=oper-161017 + git clone https://gerrit.fd.io/r/csit --branch oper-161017 Can you please use the latest one (code rebase)? Thanks. Peter Mikus Engineer – Software Cisco Systems Limited Planned absence: 28.10., 1.11., 17.11., 9.12., 19.-31.12. From: Pierre Pfister (ppfister) Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 10:52 AM To: Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Andrew Theurer <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Douglas Shakshober <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Damjan Marion (damarion) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Bill Michalowski <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; vpp-dev <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Rashid Khan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Edward Warnicke <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Thomas F Herbert <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] updated ovs vs. vpp results for 0.002% and 0% loss The recheck failed. https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/1937/console Are you sure you updated qemu ? Thanks, - Pierre _______________________________________________ csit-dev mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/csit-dev
_______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
