Pierre,
Set Code-review=-2 with a comment that your pushing a test patch. Then
push a patch with VHOST_USER_DEBUG_SOCKET set to 1 and VPP will get
rebuilt and Jenkins will run the CSIT test with that patch in place.
Once you are done debugging, then revert that patch and set
Code-review=+1 letting everyone know you are ready for the final code
review.
Thanks,
-daw-
On 10/28/2016 04:55 AM, Pierre Pfister (ppfister) wrote:
So I tested in my setup with qemu from git with tags: v2.5.0-rc0
v2.5.0-rc1 v2.5.0 v2.5.1
They all work.
Could you please have a look at the patch and give me some more logs ?
VPP with VHOST_USER_DEBUG_SOCKET set to 1 usually helps a lot, as it
logs all vhost messages received by VPP.
Thanks,
- Pierre
Le 26 oct. 2016 à 23:45, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
Excellent, thanks Ed! And let’s see …
-Maciek
On 26 Oct 2016, at 22:40, Edward Warnicke <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Maciek,
Looks like the patch was based at a point in the past that was
pointing to the old CSIT branch.
I rebased the patch, so hopefully it will now pick up the correct
CSIT branch.
Ed
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
//reduced list, updated subject
Peter is right: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/2922/16
<https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/2922/16>
looking at the last failed job -
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/1940/consoleFull
<https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/1940/consoleFull> -
it's using old csit branch - "CSIT_BRANCH=oper-161017", without
ubuntu1604, so pointless. you should rebase to pick up this
commit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/3553/
<https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/3553/> that's updating to latest
csit branch oper-161024.
-Maciek
On 26 Oct 2016, at 10:06, Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Looks like it is still testing withoper-161017 not oper-161024.
+ CSIT_BRANCH=oper-161017
+ git clonehttps://gerrit.fd.io/r/csit
<https://gerrit.fd.io/r/csit>--branch oper-161017
Can you please use the latest one (code rebase)?
Thanks.
*Peter Mikus*
Engineer – Software
*Cisco Systems Limited*
Planned absence: 28.10., 1.11., 17.11., 9.12., 19.-31.12.
*From:*Pierre Pfister (ppfister)
*Sent:*Wednesday, October 26, 2016 10:52 AM
*To:*Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
*Cc:*Andrew Theurer <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>; Douglas Shakshober
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; Damjan Marion
(damarion) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>;
Bill Michalowski <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>; vpp-dev <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>; Rashid Khan <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>; Edward Warnicke
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; Thomas F
Herbert <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
*Subject:*Re: [vpp-dev] updated ovs vs. vpp results for 0.002%
and 0% loss
The recheck failed.
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/1937/console
<https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/1937/console>
Are you sure you updated qemu ?
Thanks,
- Pierre
_______________________________________________
csit-dev mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/csit-dev
<https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/csit-dev>
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
