On 04/14/2017 06:38 PM, Burt Silverman wrote:
OK, I have the whole thing working except for that f'ing make pkg-rpm:
I come really close, but there is an issue about a dash not matching
an underscore in an rpm filename, and it quits on me at that point.
RPM package names are used to be compliant with RPM naming conventions
as specified by Centos and Fedora where dashes are used as separators.
It could be that Suse is not detected as an RPM based release so these
conventions are not applied when the package names are generated.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming?rd=Packaging:NamingGuidelines
I am working on some related packaging issues. I will be happy to work
on a patch for suse to fix this problem.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Burt Silverman <bur...@gmail.com
<mailto:bur...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I seem to have gotten lucky by remvoing -pie in the vpp/dpdk/Makefile.
Not that I know what the ramifications are, but the build went all
the way through dpdk. (I don't have all my install-deps to
complete the build at this moment.)
Burt
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Burt Silverman <bur...@gmail.com
<mailto:bur...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I downloaded openSUSE and I am seeing the same issue that
Marco sees. So far I have not been clever enough to figure it out.
Burt
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Damjan Marion (damarion)
<damar...@cisco.com <mailto:damar...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Marco,
If you want to do downstream packaging and link against
shared dpdk, you can
do it by compiling directly from autotools project. Basically:
cd src/
autoreconf -fis
export CFLAGS=….
./configure —flags
make
make install
Please note that we are intentionally linking against
static DPDK libs as want to have flexibility
of adding additional patches to dpdk build. Currently we
have bunch of patcher related to Mellanox ConnectX-5
which are not available in latest dpdk release.
May I ask what are your distro guidance when it comes to
optimization of the code for specific
microarchitectures? Do you need to support all x86_64
systems or just few latest generations?
How do you compile DPDK?
Thanks,
Damjan
> On 12 Apr 2017, at 11:33, Marco Varlese
<marco.varl...@suse.com <mailto:marco.varl...@suse.com>>
wrote:
>
> BTW, in case you're wondering which commands I am using
to build:
>
>> make bootstrap
>> make build (using build-release produces the same issue)
>
>
> Regards,
> Marco
>
> On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 09:27 +0200, Marco Varlese wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am facing a build issue with the latest VPP and not
sure if others have seen
>> the same? (I'm copying/pasting the errors below)
>>
>> It appears to be broken for both "shared dpdk" and
using the "in-repo" dpdk
>> source code. Both compilation mode worked just fine for
me using VPP 17.01 so
>> not sure if I have to change anything in the .mk files
or build the code
>> differently...
>>
>> I have to say that since I am very interested in
consuming the VPP code
>> downstream the "shared mode" compilation option is much
more valuable to me...
>>
>> Any help would be much appreciated.
>>
>>
>> When building in shared mode for dpdk I get the
following error:
>>
>> t -f 'vpp/app/version.c' || echo
'/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/vpp/build-
>> data/../src/'`vpp/app/version.c
>> [ 415s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/vpp/build-
>> data/../src/vpp/vnet/main.c:21:29: fatal error:
vpp/app/version.h: No such
>> file
>> or directory
>> [ 415s] #include <vpp/app/version.h>
>> [ 415s] ^
>> [ 415s] compilation terminated.
>> [ 415s] make[4]: *** [Makefile:5872:
vpp/vnet/bin_vpp-main.o] Error 1
>> [ 415s] make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> [ 415s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/vpp/build-
>> data/../src/vpp/app/version.c:17:29: fatal error:
vpp/app/version.h: No such
>> file or directory
>> [ 415s] #include <vpp/app/version.h>
>> [ 415s] ^
>> [ 415s] compilation terminated.
>> [ 415s] make[4]: *** [Makefile:5900:
vpp/app/bin_vpp-version.o] Error 1
>> [ 415s] mv -f vpp/app/.deps/bin_vpp-vpe_cli.Tpo
vpp/app/.deps/bin_vpp-
>> vpe_cli.Po
>> [ 416s] mv -f
vpp-api/pneum/.deps/libpneum_la-pneum.Tpo vpp-
>> api/pneum/.deps/libpneum_la-pneum.Plo
>> [ 425s] make[4]: Leaving directory
'/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/vpp/build-
>> root/build-vpp-native/vpp'
>> [ 425s] make[3]: *** [Makefile:6764: all-recursive]
Error 1
>> [ 425s] make[3]: Leaving directory
'/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/vpp/build-
>> root/build-vpp-native/vpp'
>> [ 425s] make[2]: *** [Makefile:3426: all] Error 2
>> [ 425s] make[2]: Leaving directory
'/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/vpp/build-
>> root/build-vpp-native/vpp'
>> [ 425s] make[1]: *** [Makefile:699: vpp-build] Error 2
>> [ 425s] make[1]: Leaving directory
'/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/vpp/build-
>> root'
>> [ 425s] make: *** [Makefile:213: build-release] Error 2
>> [ 425s] error: Bad exit status from
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.t3xVux (%build)
>> [ 425s]
>> [ 425s]
>> [ 425s] RPM build errors:
>> [ 425s] Bad exit status from
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.t3xVux (%build)
>> [ 425s]
>> [ 425s] linux-yk3w.suse failed "build vpp.spec" at Tue
Apr 11 07:19:21 UTC
>> 2017.
>> [ 425s]
>>
>>
>> On the other hand, when building the code using the
in-repo dpdk source code I
>> get the following one:
>>
>> CC test.o
>>
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/6/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
>> /usr/lib64/libmvec_nonshared.a(svml_finite_alias.oS):
relocation R_X86_64_PC32
>> against undefined symbol `_ZGVbN2v_log@@GLIBC_2.22' can
not be used when
>> making
>> a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
>>
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/6/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
final
>> link failed: Bad value
>> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>>
/home/mvarlese/repos/vpp/build-root/build-vpp-native/dpdk/dpdk-
>> 17.02/mk/rte.app.mk:235 <http://rte.app.mk:235>: recipe
for target 'cmdline_test' failed
>> make[9]: *** [cmdline_test] Error 1
>>
/home/mvarlese/repos/vpp/build-root/build-vpp-native/dpdk/dpdk-
>> 17.02/mk/rte.subdir.mk:61 <http://rte.subdir.mk:61>:
recipe for target 'cmdline_test' failed
>> make[8]: *** [cmdline_test] Error 2
>> make[8]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> CC resource.o
>>
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>> Marco
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> vpp-dev mailing list
>> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
>> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
<https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev>
> _______________________________________________
> vpp-dev mailing list
> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
<https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev>
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
<https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev>
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
--
*Thomas F Herbert*
Fast Data Planes
Office of Technology
*Red Hat*
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
