Hi Ed, how fast are your boxes? And how many cores? The BFD tests struggle to meet the aggresive timings on slower boxes...
Thanks, Klement Quoting Ed Kern (ejk) (2017-05-23 20:43:55) > No problem. > If anyone is curious in rubbernecking the accident that is the current > test-all (at least for my build system) > adding a comment of > testall > SHOULD trigger and fire it off on my end. > make it all pass and you win a beer (or beverage of your choice) > Ed > > On May 23, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Dave Wallace <[1]dwallac...@gmail.com> > wrote: > Ed, > > Thanks for adding this to the shadow build system. Real data on the > cost and effectiveness of this will be most useful. > > -daw- > On 5/23/2017 1:30 PM, Ed Kern (ejk) wrote: > > In the vpp-dev call a couple hours ago there was a discussion of running > test-debug on a regular/default? basis. > As a trial I’ve added a new job to the shadow build system: > > vpp-test-debug-master-ubuntu1604 > > Will do a make test-debug, as part of verify set, as an ADDITIONAL job. > > > I gave a couple passes with test-all but can’t ever get a clean run with > test-all (errors in test_bfd and test_ip6 ). > I don’t think this is unusual or unexpected. Ill leave it to someone else > to say that ‘all’ throwing failures is a good thing. > I’m happy to add another job for/with test-all if someone wants to actually > debug those errors. > > flames, comments,concerns welcome.. > > Ed > > PS Please note/remember that all these tests are non-voting regardless of > success or failure. > _______________________________________________ > vpp-dev mailing list > [2]vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > [3]https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev > > References > > Visible links > 1. mailto:dwallac...@gmail.com > 2. mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > 3. https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev _______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
