Hi Matus,
Thanks! Any suggestions on what that can be done to alleviate the issues? The above test was done with a single client, but the same symptoms are shown when throwing far more flows at it, around 5.5 million sessions, from thousands of L3 sources.? John ________________________________ From: Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <matfa...@cisco.com> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 6:21 AM To: John Biscevic; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] NAT workers above 4 completely tanks performance Hi, in your case most of NAT translations are done in one core. With 4 cores you are lucky and flows arrive at same core where translations are processing (no worker handoff) and with 10 cores there is worker handoff between two workers and it is reason of performance drop. Basically your flows are not symmetrically distributed between cores. Matus From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> On Behalf Of JB Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 4:25 AM To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] NAT workers above 4 completely tanks performance Hi Damjan, Absolutely. I raw one case with the default number of NAT workers (10) which has poor performance, and another case with a fewer number of NAT workers (4) showing great performance. They're separated by two different files, both are attached. John
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11748): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11748 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/28802889/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
