Thanks, Neale. The other assert I found, I opened Jira VPP-1786 for; currently that is assigned to Klement. It is:
--- test setUp() for TestSRMPLS.test_sr_mpls( SR MPLS ) starts here --- /home/burt/vpp/build-root/install-vpp_debug-native/vpp/bin/vpp[3585]: /home/burt/vpp/src/vnet/dpo/load_balance.c:614 (load_balance_multipath_update) assertion `DPO_LOAD_BALANCE == dpo->dpoi_type' fails Burt On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:48 AM Neale Ranns (nranns) <nra...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Burt, > > > > Two separate issues : > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/22597 > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/22598 > > > > thanks for the report 😊 > > > > /neale > > > > *From: *"Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com> > *Date: *Monday 7 October 2019 at 21:28 > *To: *"Benoit Ganne (bganne)" <bga...@cisco.com>, Burt Silverman < > bur...@gmail.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, "Neale Ranns (nranns)" < > nra...@cisco.com> > *Subject: *RE: [vpp-dev] test_srmpls.py and test_ip_mcast.py fail under > "make test-debug" > > > > Dear Ben, > > > > Looping in Neale. The failure is 100% reproducible, due to the highlighted > ASSERT. > > > > According to gdb, fib_table->ft_total_route_counts is 1 not zero. > > > > HTH... Dave > > > > void > > ip6_fib_table_destroy (u32 fib_index) > > { > > /* > > * all link local first ... > > */ > > fib_prefix_t pfx = { > > .fp_proto = FIB_PROTOCOL_IP6, > > .fp_len = 10, > > .fp_addr = { > > .ip6 = { > > .as_u8 = { > > [0] = 0xFE, > > [1] = 0x80, > > }, > > }, > > } > > }; > > fib_table_entry_delete(fib_index, > > &pfx, > > FIB_SOURCE_SPECIAL); > > > > /* > > * ... then the default route. > > */ > > pfx.fp_addr.ip6.as_u64[0] = 0; > > pfx.fp_len = 00; > > fib_table_entry_special_remove(fib_index, > > &pfx, > > FIB_SOURCE_DEFAULT_ROUTE); > > > > fib_table_t *fib_table = fib_table_get(fib_index, FIB_PROTOCOL_IP6); > > fib_source_t source; > > > > /* > > * validate no more routes. > > */ > > ASSERT(0 == fib_table->ft_total_route_counts); > > FOR_EACH_FIB_SOURCE(source) > > { > > ASSERT(0 == fib_table->ft_src_route_counts[source]); > > } > > > > if (~0 != fib_table->ft_table_id) > > { > > hash_unset (ip6_main.fib_index_by_table_id, fib_table->ft_table_id); > > } > > pool_put_index(ip6_main.v6_fibs, fib_table->ft_index); > > pool_put(ip6_main.fibs, fib_table); > > } > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> On Behalf Of Benoit Ganne > (bganne) via Lists.Fd.Io > Sent: Monday, October 7, 2019 12:11 PM > To: Burt Silverman <bur...@gmail.com>; vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] test_srmpls.py and test_ip_mcast.py fail under > "make test-debug" > > > > > I wonder if anybody knows why 7/10 tests fail for these test cases > > > with "make test-debug" but all pass using "make test". > > > > If I remember well, test_ip_mcast fails because of an ASSERT() in ip6 fib > complaining it is not empty or similar. Obviously this is a bug. > > You can check in /tmp/vpp-failed-unittests/*/log.txt to get more > information about the issue. > > We do not run (yet) make test in debug mode as voting jobs (only in > release mode for now) so we sometime miss some ASSERT()... > > If you can open Jira tickets for each one it would be helpful. > > > > ben >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#14143): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/14143 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/34429321/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
