> Redefine the macro for the Coverity case, so Coverity doesn't complain. It > just needs to be representative of the execution you expect to happen.
Ha yes good point, I was focusing on the ASSERT()... Just did that: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/22936 Hopefully, Coverity should remove the false positives with that. Thx ben
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#14271): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/14271 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/36443369/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
