<snip>

> 
> Hi Damjan,
> 
> ARM defines two sets of performance monitoring counters and extension
> 1. Common Event number and micro-architecture events defined by ARM
> which every chip vendor should implement.
> 2. Chip vendor specific PMU counters other than (1)
> 
> I am not in ThunderX2 BU but I think the kernel driver you are referring to
> seems to be a PMU extension which falls under the category of (2) above. See
> below for OCTEONTX2 output
> 
> So for ARM to be enabled in perfmon plugin, I am thinking,
> - we need common bundle to register common ARM PMU events. This should
> be first step and include most of the useful/important events
> - chip vendor specific bundle should also be allowed to "implementation
> defined" PMU events
> 
> One of the key differentiation in ARM is a kernel driver needs to be hooked at
> runtime to allow VPP to get hold of PMU counters (which is not the case with
> x86)
> 
> >>> Can you capture contents of /sys/bus/event_source/devices/ from one
> system?
> I do not have ThunderX2 access but here is the output of OCTEONTX2
On thunderx2:
honnag01@2u-thunderx2:~$ ls /sys/bus/event_source/devices/
armv8_pmuv3_0  breakpoint  kprobe  software  tracepoint  uncore_dmc_0  
uncore_dmc_1  uncore_l3c_0  uncore_l3c_1  uprobe

2u-thunderx2:~$ ls /sys/bus/event_source/devices/uncore_dmc_0/
cpumask  events  format  perf_event_mux_interval_ms  power  subsystem  type  
uevent

> 
> $ ls -ltr /sys/bus/event_source/devices/ total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec
> 14 06:48 software -> ../../../devices/software lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 14
> 06:48 cs_etm -> ../../../devices/cs_etm lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 14 06:48
> breakpoint -> ../../../devices/breakpoint lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 14 
> 06:48
> tracepoint -> ../../../devices/tracepoint lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 14 
> 06:48
> armv8_cavium_thunder -> ../../../devices/armv8_cavium_thunder
> 
> Thanks,
> Nitin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Damjan Marion <dmar...@me.com>
> > Sent: Monday, December 14, 2020 4:19 PM
> > To: Nitin Saxena <nsax...@marvell.com>
> > Cc: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
> > Subject: Re: [EXT] [vpp-dev] New perfmon plugin
> >
> >
> > Isn’t there also uncore PMU? I can see some thunderx2 specific driver
> > in kernel source.
> >
> > Can you capture contents of /sys/bus/event_source/devices/ from one
> > system?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > —
> > Damjan
> >
> >
> > > On 14.12.2020., at 09:09, Nitin Saxena <nsax...@marvell.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes most of the ARM processors including ThunderX2, OCTEONTX2 has
> > PMU as per AARCH64 specifications. I did some analysis to add ARM
> > support in older perfmon plugin and should be easy to port to this new
> > one. This is something in TODO list which is much needed for us and
> > overall ARM
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Nitin
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Damjan Marion <dmar...@me.com>
> > >> Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2020 7:46 PM
> > >> To: Nitin Saxena <nsax...@marvell.com>
> > >> Cc: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
> > >> Subject: Re: [EXT] [vpp-dev] New perfmon plugin
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> cool, if I got it right ThunderX2 have own PMU so we can add it as
> > >> new source and create specific bundles.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Damjan
> > >>
> > >>> On 12.12.2020., at 11:07, Nitin Saxena <nsax...@marvell.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi Damjan,
> > >>>
> > >>> I was already fan of older perfmon plugin and new one seems
> > >>> superset of the older one (at-least from video)
> > >>>
> > >>> Nice addition
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Nitin
> > >>>
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> On Behalf Of
> > >>>> Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io
> > >>>> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 9:44 PM
> > >>>> To: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
> > >>>> Subject: [EXT] [vpp-dev] New perfmon plugin
> > >>>>
> > >>>> External Email
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> ----
> > >>>> -
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Guys,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I just submitted patch with the new perfmon plugin: [1]
> > >>>>
> > >>>> It takes significantly different approach compared to current one.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> - it support multiple sources of perf counters (linux, intel
> > >>>> core, intel uncore) and it is extensible to other vendors
> > >>>> - it have concept instances so it can monitor multiple instances
> > >>>> of specific PMU (DRAM channels, UPI/QPU links, ..)
> > >>>> - it supports node, thread and system metrics
> > >>>> - different metrics are organized in bundles, where bundle
> > >>>> consists of multiple counters and format functions which
> > >>>> calculates and
> > presents
> > >> metric.
> > >>>> Yuo can find example of bundle here [2]
> > >>>>
> > >>>> To se how this looks in action, I captured small asciinema video:
> > >>>> [3]
> > >>>>
> > >>>> As this new plugin is significantly different than old one, I
> > >>>> wonder if anyone thinks we should keep old une.
> > >>>> Also, any other feedback is wellcome.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Damjan
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> > >>>> 3A__gerrit.fd.io_r_c_vpp_-
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
> 2B_30186&d=DwIFAg&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=S4H7jibYAtA5YOvfL3
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
> IkGduCfk9LbZMPOAecQGDzWV0&m=YLtsj5dRrH71jbO5dLDi4wZVjd_BZiWves
> > >>>>
> > g69AEyXxg&s=4tTXQv2yVPh7WGV5S1eL8TKk7hzW5hs9HV5HffGAZWg&e=
> > >>>> [2] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> > >>>> 3A__gerrit.fd.io_r_c_vpp_-
> > >>>> 2B_30186_12_src_plugins_perfmon_intel_bundle_load-
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
> 5Fblocks.c&d=DwIFAg&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=S4H7jibYAtA5YOvfL3
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
> IkGduCfk9LbZMPOAecQGDzWV0&m=YLtsj5dRrH71jbO5dLDi4wZVjd_BZiWves
> > >>>> g69AEyXxg&s=4vBJsKjTB2jgQ_knZlMqSPL9zu9r61mn_EDKfPaxP30&e=
> > >>>> [3] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
> 3A__asciinema.org_a_aFN5rMFYw0RPvGOZiFsziXV5w&d=DwIFAg&c=nKjWec
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
> 2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=S4H7jibYAtA5YOvfL3IkGduCfk9LbZMPOAecQGDzWV0
> > >>>> &m=YLtsj5dRrH71jbO5dLDi4wZVjd_BZiWvesg69AEyXxg&s=OOSrE-
> > >>>> xR_qMePcPBdjlV1FSyjeguxIFhIl7_W98ghFk&e=
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> > >

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#18328): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/18328
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/78904118/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to