Let me close this. I am not paid by dpdk Or vpp.
It my indivisual thoughts. Sorry if I *****... On Tue, 9 Nov, 2021, 1:30 am Damjan Marion, <dmar...@me.com> wrote: > > > > On 08.11.2021., at 20:21, Mrityunjay Kumar <kumarn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thank you for the clarification. > > > > Inline please, > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 9 Nov, 2021, 12:45 am Damjan Marion, <dmar...@me.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 8 Nov, 2021, 10:18 pm Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io, > <dmarion=me....@lists.fd.io> wrote: > > > > > > > > No, I didn’t bother… Not using DPDK for a long time... > > > > > > We know that, > > > > Who are “We”? > > > > Dpdk users as older than VPP as open source. > > DPDK users are not the only people on this list and even if you have > mandate to represent all of them I don't think you have > a right to dictate what people are allowed to say on this list. > > Also, it is not clear to me why it matters which one is older in > open-source. > This sounds to me like “my dad is stronger than yours” kind of > argumentation. > > > > > > > > not required to say, but many of us following DPDK and VPP. > > > > I disagree, i think it is important to say as many people is not aware > that VPP is not DPDK application > > and that VPP works better when DPDK is not involved. > > > > May be, but for me still it's magic, > > > > > > I am saying let have respect of both users. > > I absolutely have respect for both users and I didn’t do anything > disrespectful. > I simply said that i didn’t bother to compile dpdk as it doesn’t bring any > value to me. > > — > Damjan > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#20458): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20458 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/86312689/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
