I find this problem and I fix it by a tmp methods.

----------
alexan

--------------原始邮件--------------
发件人:"Nathael Leblanc via lists.fd.io 
"<[email protected]&gt;;
发送时间:2026年3月19日(星期四) 中午11:52
收件人:"[email protected]" <[email protected]&gt;;"neale" 
<[email protected]&gt;;
主题:[vpp-dev] Patch Review Request - linux-cp: prevent MAC address sync on 
non-Ethernet interface
-----------------------------------

 Good evening everyone,

Could I please request a patch review on https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/45271 
-- I promise it's a short one but a good one!

The patch addresses a segmentation fault in the linux-cp plugin that is 
triggered during routing convergence or IP assignment on strictly-Layer3 tunnel 
interfaces (e.g., in our use case, WireGuard interfaces).

The issue stems from LCP assuming the underlying `vnet_hw_interface_t` 
possesses an Ethernet hardware class. For L3 interfaces:

In `lcp_itf_pair_create`, indexing into `ethernet_main.interfaces` with the 
tunnel's `hw-&gt;hw_instance` leads to type confusion and an out-of-bounds read.

In `lcp_router_link_addr`, unconditionally comparing the MAC address results in 
an invalid memory read and a downstream "Secondary MAC Addresses not supported" 
panic.
The patch adds a hardware class guard (`hw-&gt;hw_class_index == 
ethernet_hw_interface_class.index`) before attempting L2 operations. This 
bypasses MAC synchronization for non-broadcast/L3 tunnels while preserving 
normal behavior for standard DPDK, RDMA, AF_PACKET, and Loopback interfaces.

Feedback and reviews are appreciated.

Thank you,
-Nat

Nathael Leblanc
CEO &amp; Co-Founder, Joust Security

+1.514.800.8071&nbsp;|&nbsp;[email protected]

www.joustsec.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#26892): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/26892
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/118395699/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/leave/14379924/21656/631435203/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to