Hello Feroz, Benoit is correct, I am not using LD_PRELOAD. I introduced a native VCL backend for SPDK. It supports both target and initiator sides. Please note that it’s very early and still contains many issues. My first goal was to get an estimate of where it can land in terms of performance. I am still working on it to stabilize it. Jerome
De : [email protected] <[email protected]> de la part de Benoit Ganne (bganne) via lists.fd.io <[email protected]> Date : jeudi, 19 mars 2026 à 18:13 À : vpp-dev <[email protected]> Objet : Re: [vpp-dev] SPDK NVMe-oF TCP with VPP HostStack – Integration Questions Hi Feroz, > We are currently working on a setup involving SPDK NVMe-oF TCP on a DPU, and > we are exploring integration with VPP Host Stack on both the target and > initiator sides. > We have a few questions and would appreciate any guidance: > Did you integrate VPP/VCL directly into SPDK’s socket layer (e.g., via a > custom socket implementation), or did you use LD_PRELOAD with libvcl? I suspect you might be referring to Jerome's experiments. If so you can find his modifications here: https://github.com/jtollet/spdk/tree/vcl-backend. As far as I can tell it uses direct vppcom integration, not LD_PRELOAD. Best ben
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#26895): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/26895 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/118399163/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/leave/14379924/21656/631435203/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
