On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:33:12AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: > >>On toh for my private build from upstream src (on going to build latest > >>0.30.210), I disabled use of dietlibc (not yet available for hppa at this > >>time) and all seems to works fine. > > > > > > really depends on the dietlibc, but I'd assume it > > is _still_ broken on HPPA, nevertheless the glibc > > is _not_ a good alternative, although it _might_ > > work for simple things. > > I guess we can find out when Joel sends results of tests?
possible, well, testme and testfs will not detect the insecurities introduced by glibc > > PS: I hope that dietlibc on hppa will be fixed soon. > > Have the issues on HPPA been brought to the dietlibc developers? yes, but AFAICT, they were ignored ... best, Herbert > micah > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFD4l2h9n4qXRzy1ioRAsKMAKCv8YQr/D/9YQDQc/XOAQO/pJwe2wCggmD+ > sRKaersGBPipGCipwjTdHP0= > =YeQB > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
