On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 05:12:23PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 09:50:01AM -0600, Corey Wright wrote: > > > vserver test101 build -m debootstrap --hostname t101.foo.org --context 101 > > --interface hansi=dummy0:192.168.0.101/16 -- -d sarge -m > > http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se/debian-amd64/debian > > > > if that doesn't work, i'd attribute the problem to the util-vserver version > > (as 0.30.209 works for me). > > vserver v16 build --force -n v16 --hostname v16.ativel.com --context 101 > --interface eth0:192.168.0.16/24 -m debootstrap -- -d sarge -m > http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/ > > did work for me, thanks Corey. > > What does --context 101 do, actually?
set a proper static context id (101) for that guest all guests must have one, and it should better be unique on a host (range 2-49151 for now) ... HTH, Herbert > > > I'm still not sure whether I should stick with an unsupported AMD64 Sarge > > > or go with a vanilla i386 Sarge (the machine only has 4 GBytes) -- i.e. > > > will it hurt performance badly? 2 GByte/process limit won't bite, will > > > absence of twice as many registers in AMD64 mode? But gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4 > > > doesn't support AMD64 all that well anyway, right? > > > > i don't personally have benchmark numbers (have yet to install a i386 > > guest), but the performance reported by others (due to the extra registers) > > is the entire reason i purchased amd64 hardware, waiting until debian had a > > Subjectively, it is a pretty speedy machine -- even though it's only a 2.0 GHz > single-core Opteron 146. One of my old Athlon machines died in the rack, so > if it's > the motherboard I'm considering fixing it up with an Athlon 64 board. > > > stable/"sarge" amd64 release. you might be able to get a comparable > > speed-up on amd64 with a 32-bit kernel and/or user-land by recompiling all > > packages with a more specific -mtune (ie 32-bit instruction set but > > including scheduling, MMX, SSE, SSE2 support) than debian's i386 packages > > (ie -mtune=i486), but i'll leave that trouble to gentoo users. ;-) > > I am considering recompiling a few packages, once gcc-4.x.x is available > for Sarge. But for time being, I'd be glad just having a stable running > system. > > -- > Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org > ______________________________________________________________ > ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com > 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
