I think they are intuitive as well. It looks good to me.
On 9/28/06, Tim Mecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
> What's with all the funky signs after filenames? Wouldn't it be better
> with something like what the boring CSS template has, i.e. [symlink],
> [script], etc?
Maybe..
As I always disable css at the flower page I didn't take it into
consideration.
The 'funky' signs are basically taken from 'ls -F' ( '/' for directory,
'@' for symlinks, '*' for executables. The rest are supplemented ('#'
for hash files, '<num>'/'<min>-<max>' for number of lines in the files).
I think these signs are quite intuitive.
Ciao
Tim
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
