On Fri, 11 May 2007 08:04:49 +0100 "Ben Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2007 04:05:21 +0100, Corey Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > the only problems i've encounter without COW is: > > Excellent, thankyou for that, those were exactly the sorts of problems I > expected. > > I'd like to read the thread about pruning and the patches. The archive > doesn't search well through google and has no inbuilt search. Any idea > when the discussion was? I would prefer not to load anyones servers (and > my HD) by downloading the lot. i found the relevant marked/flagged emails in my personal email archive and then searched google for the quoted email subject. "clean-up hash directory" http://www.paul.sladen.org/vserver/archives/200609/0016.html "dpkg fails when upgrading hashified setuid files" http://www.paul.sladen.org/vserver/archives/200608/0045.html "suggestion for hashify improvement" http://www.paul.sladen.org/vserver/archives/200609/0163.html seem's paul has the "better" vserver mailing list archive, at least in google's opinion. ;-) i can't vouch for tim's patch against vhashify because i haven't gotten around to applying it (but i plan on doing it when i upgrade from sarge to etch and upgrade the util-vserver package). please let us know how it goes if you do it. corey -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
