In the case where double or float hold a "NaN" value the result for both less than and greater than is false. Currently the way of determining greater than is the opposite of the less than and equal result. For when NaN is one of the values this does not work. How would you suggest we address this issue?
- Comparisons classes for double and float NaN values Eldon Carman
- Re: Comparisons classes for double and float NaN values Till Westmann
