Would it be possible to special-case this in the AbstractNegatingComparisonOperation? Otherwise it seems to be that we would need to special-case this in the subclasses of AbstractNegatingComparisonOperation by overriding the corresponding operate... methods.
Does this make sense? Cheers, Till On Aug 22, 2012, at 1:37 PM, Eldon Carman wrote: > In the case where double or float hold a "NaN" value the result for > both less than and greater than is false. Currently the way of > determining greater than is the opposite of the less than and equal > result. For when NaN is one of the values this does not work. How > would you suggest we address this issue?
