Am Montag, 18. September 2006 00:41 schrieb Christian Vest Hansen:
> (why don't these mails have a Reply-To header?)
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Christian Vest Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 18/09/2006 0.38
> Subject: Re: [Warzone-dev] Fwd: Re: Warzone 2100 in Debian
> To: Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> novideo.rpl was with the original source and thus I assume it to be
> 100% GPL although it states otherwise.
> I have no idea if anything would break if it was removed.
I bet that would drive the intelligence screen unusable. ;)
Probably a bunch of code needs to be edited. Definitely not before 2.1.

> Worth trying out if the license notice can't be corrected.
?

> The COMPILE.html file is more or less public domain, I think. Rodzilla
> wrote the windows part of it and I've written the linux part.
> I don't care what license it has, and I don't think Rodzilla has
> either. If it helps you move on, feel free to tag it as GPL, and let
> Rodzilla sue me if he has a problem with that ;)
>
> install-sh ... is that used for anything? If it can be automatically
> generated at the user site, then it should be generated, and left out
> of the repository. IMHO.
>
> Cheers.
Ok, so change the license of novideo.rpl to GPL (what it was before anyway, 
just not stated correctly), change COMPILE* to GPL as well and hope we don't 
get sued by Rod ;) and don't run ./autogen.sh for release tarballs anymore. 
(Instead tell the user to do it.)

--Dennis

Attachment: pgp8QWDdE8Nyf.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev

Reply via email to