Dennis Schridde schreef: > Am Montag, 9. April 2007 schrieb Dennis Schridde: > >> Am Montag, 9. April 2007 schrieb Giel van Schijndel: >> >>> Author: muggenhor >>> Date: Mon Apr 9 17:02:04 2007 >>> New Revision: 1048 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/warzone?rev=1048&view=rev >>> Log: >>> * add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS >>> >> Quoting man:gcc >> >> -Werror-implicit-function-declaration >> This warning is enabled by -Wall (as a warning, not an error). >> >> -Werror >> Make all warnings into errors. >> > So this is not needed for debug=strict. (Well, you didn't add it there...) > And for debug=yes it is IMO not wanted, since yes!=strict. > Well, actually I did add it there on purpose (non-strict) since most implicit declarations later on simply result in linker errors (and linker errors are IMO difficult to trace).
And aside from that, implicit function declarations are (almost? can't think of any justified case at all) always very, very bad practice. So when considering that to be bad, one should not allow the compiler to accept it. But then again, it's just my opinion that implicit function declarations are very bad. -- Giel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
