Am Montag, 9. April 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen: > On 4/9/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, why not remove the different debug modes at all then? > > strict works pretty well atm so we could let it become yes and also merge > > relaxed and no... > > We could/should merge "yes" and "strict" done
> but "relaxed" adds -Wextra Indeed. Maybe we could get the code extra clean and remove relaxed, too. > and -O2 speed optimizations It doesn't do that itself. This is autotool's default cflag. > , and "no" adds -DNDEBUG and omits -g -g comes with autotool's default cflags as well. But "no" doesn't enforce it, yes. > (and should add -O3), IMHO. IMHO it should not do that... Optimization should be set by the distributor and not by us. Actually we should only force those flags which are necessary and -O3 very certainly is not. It should be well known that -O3 brings very little to no performance improvements against -O2, but takes awefully much longer to compile and produces bigger binaries. And type-punning warnings are allready produced by -O2... And I doubt that many people will use -O3 when compiling or distributing binaries. Again I strongly vote against forcing any unnecessary flags. --Dennis
pgpshhnvjF7lF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
